🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our children's youth". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a law lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors except if parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good first step," commented the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "based on robust research".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the family of a teenager who died after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build tools that are safe and fit for children," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating parental consent for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various politicians to follow the Australian path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from these regions, additional nations are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, global bodies strike a more cautious position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

As this global conversation evolves, the policies of Australia and its followers show that states around the world are increasingly content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.